Just above
Lock and Dam 2 at Hastings, MN the navigation channel in the Mississippi River
makes a tight turn, almost 90 degrees.
According to the navigation industry, 54 groundings have occurred at the
site since 1990 and tows cannot move through the turn with a full load of 15
barges.
In an effort
to make navigation more profitable on this stretch of the Mississippi River, the
Army Corps of Engineers is proposing to cut a new channel to circumvent the
bend through what was known before the dam was built as Boulanger Slough.
![]() |
Source: US Army Corps of Engineers |
Is it a good
idea? The navigation industry argues
that new channel is necessary to increase profitability. But the Corps must justify
the new channel from an operations and maintenance cost-benefit perspective. When companies have to pay more to run
smaller barge fleets, it’s not a public operations and maintenance expense.
What are the public expenses of the proposed Boulanger Slough channel? So far, the public expenses add up to cutting the new channel itself, dredging more sediment downstream, mitigating the environmental impact, and disposing of contaminated sediment
The new
channel cut will certainly increase sedimentation downstream, which may increase the cost
of operations and maintenance since it will require more dredging downstream. There may also be costs associated with
special handling of contaminated sediment since the site has elevated levels of
contaminates including nickel, PAHs, PCBs, and other heavy metals. But the Corps hopes to dodge environmental mitigation
requirements by asking the Upper Mississippi River Restoration program do a
restoration project downstream – a program that is not in the mitigation
business.
Even with all these certain costs, the Corps still thinks the project will overall reduce channel maintenance expenses, but they haven't produced the figures for all of it. If the
project moves forward, the Corps will be holding public meetings within the
next year. So stay tuned for opportunities
to comment.
No comments:
Post a Comment